This headline isn't silly
This headline is silly: "US now outraged by a naked man!"
Not true. The vast majority of the US enjoys a naked man every now and then.
But the point of the story is that Barnes and Noble has refused to carry an art magazine that had a cover showing a sculpture of a nude man. That, of course, means I must put here:
Barnes and Nobles is pro-censorship
You'll love the description of the sculpture: "Burford, in Adelaide visiting family, said his work was supposed to evoke sympathy for a man who exhilarates in wetting himself in his dead mother's sewing room."
Isn't art wonderful?
